Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 53 (0.38 seconds)
Memo Of Parties 1­4 vs . on 11 March, 2022 cites

All India Judges' Association And ... vs Union Of India And Others on 24 August, 1993

Court on 13.03.2018, it was disposed of taking note of the fact that the issues raised in the said IA relates to the dispute inter se between the individual/groups, which would not be appropriate for determination in the scope of IA. The Supreme Court, therefore, declined to entertain the IA any further leaving the parties to resort to such remedy as may be available to them in law. The IA was thus decided in the following terms:­ "The issue raised in I.A. No.334 of 2014 in Writ Petition (Civil) No.1022/1989, as it appears to us from the materials on record, relates to the disputes inter se between the individual/groups, which, in our considered vie, would not be appropriate for determination by this Court in I.A. (No.334 of 2014) filed in W.P. (C) No.1022/1989 (All India Judges Association v. Union of India).We, therefore, decline to entertain the I.A. any further leaving the parties to have resort to such remedies as may be available to them in law."
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 482 - P B Sawant - Full Document

Delhi Judicial Services Assn. & Ors vs Delhi High Court & Ors on 1 May, 2001

Unlike proviso to Rule 7 B of the Delhi Higher Judicial Service Rules, which clearly stipulated that not more than 1/3 rd posts could be held by the direct recruits, there is no such prohibition in the Rules of 1973. Thus the two­Judge­ committee of the High Court came to a definite conclusion that judgment of the Supreme Court in Delhi Judicial Services Association and Others vs. Delhi High Court and Others, (2001) 5 SCC 145, would not be applicable in case of any direct recruitment under the Rules of 1973.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 54 - Full Document

All India Judges Association And Ors vs Union Of India And Ors on 21 March, 2002

22. Shri Shrawan Dogra and Shri R.K. Bawa, learned Senior Counsels appearing on behalf of petitioners have argued that genesis of the dispute in present matters lies in the High Court not implementing the post based roster with effect from 31.03.2003 despite specific direction of the Supreme Court in 2002 judgment of All India Judges Association case, supra. Although the High Court framed the Rules in 2004 which were notified in the official gazette of the State of Himachal Pradesh on 20.03.2004 but it implemented the post based roster with effect from 31.03.2010 instead of 31.03.2003.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 147 - Full Document

Honble High Court Of Judicature At ... vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 28 March, 2018

73. The Supreme Court in High Court of Judicature at Allahabad through Registrar General versus State of Uttar Pradesh and others (2018) 15 SCC 439 while dealing with the dispute of seniority of the promotes and direct recruits held that quota­rota rule is undoubtedly mandatory requirement but its applicability is to be adjudged in peculiar fact situation of each case. If it becomes impracticable to act upon a rule fixing quota from two sources, it is no use insisting that the authority must give effect to such a rule. It should be given practical interpretation. In that case, no suitability test for promotion as mandated was conducted till 2008. Besides, in absence of determination of vacancies, seniority of promotees also could not be fixed. Thus, application of rota rule would prejudice promotes. Interference by High Court with seniority ::: Downloaded on - 14/03/2022 20:11:28 :::CIS 100 given to promotees above direct recruits without following rota rule was held to be unsustainable. The relevant observations .
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 4 - A K Goel - Full Document

H.P. Judicial Service Officers ... vs State Of H.P. And Others on 4 November, 2016

"Since, it is reported that identical prayer is subject matter of consideration in Civil Writ Petition No.696 of 2010, titled H.P. Judicial Service Officers Association v. State of Himachal Pradesh, before the High Court of Himachal Pradesh, we are of the view that the parties should be relegated to work out their remedy in the said writ petition and await the outcome of the said writ petition."
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 5 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 Next