Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.25 seconds)Section 10 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Section 12 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
The Registrar, Supreme Court Of India vs Commodore Lokesh K.Batra And Ors. on 4 December, 2014
35. It is noteworthy that CPIO can only provide such information as is held in
the office record, and as a matter of fact, he/she is not obligated to create
information as per the desire of the applicant under the mandate of RTI Act.
The Commission placed reliance on a judgement passed by the Hon'ble High
Court of Delhi dated 04.12.2014 in the case of The Registrar, Supreme Court of
India vs. Commodore Lokesh K. Batra and Ors. [W.P.(C) No. 6634/2011],
wherein the Court has held as under:
Hansi Rawat & Anr. vs Punjab National Bank & Ors. on 11 January, 2013
36. Further, the issue flagged by the Appellant challenging the veracity of
information furnished by the CPIO is a matter of grievance which is beyond the
jurisdiction of the RTI Act, 2005. As far as jurisdiction of Commission is
concerned, a reference may be had of a judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of
Delhi in the matter of Hansi Rawat and Anr. v. Punjab National Bank and Ors.
(LPA No.785/2012) dated 11.01.2013wherein it has been held as under:
State(Govt Of Nct Of Delhi) vs Rajinder Prasad Sharma on 2 December, 2014
37. The aforesaid rationale finds resonance in another judgment of the
Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the matter ofGovt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Rajender
Prasad (W.P.[C] 10676/2016) dated 30.11.2017wherein it was held as under:
Union Of India vs This Review Petition Having Come Up For ... on 26 February, 2014
38. While, the Apex Court in the matter of Union of India vs Namit Sharma
(Review Petition [C] No.2309 of 2012) dated 03.09.2013observed as under:
1