Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.22 seconds)Section 115 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Shri. Nirmal Enem Horo vs Smt. Jahan Ara Jaipal Singh on 26 April, 1973
(iv) In Shri Nirmal Enem Horo Vs. Smt.Jahan Ara Jaipal Singh,
reported in (1973) 2 Supreme Court 189, our Hon'ble Apex Court has held
as follows:
S. Sampoornam vs P.V. Kuppuswamy on 11 April, 2007
In support of argument advanced by the learned counsel
appearing for the revision petitioners/decree holders, he relied on the
judgment in S.Sampoornam and another Vs. P.V.Kuppuswamy & 8
others, reported in 2007 (3) CTC 529, in which, this Court has held that
once a decree for specific performance is decreed, execution of sale deed
and delivery of possession, is consequential. Further, it was held that the
claim of the defendants under Section 47 CPC, without any title to the
properties, is legally unsustainable.
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
C.T.A. Ct. Nachiappa Chettiar vs M.G. Ramaswami Pillai on 25 March, 1963
(v) In C.T.A. C.T.Nachiappa Chettiar Vs. M.G.Ramaswami Pillai,
reported in AIR 1964 Madras 236, this Court has held as follows:
K.Palanisamy vs K.Paramasivam on 11 August, 2011
(ii) In K.Palanisamy Vs. K.Paramasivam & Others, reported in CDJ
2011 MHC 4331, this Court has held as follows:
General Instruments Company vs Union Of India & Ors on 25 August, 2008
(i) In General Instruments Company Vs. Union of India & Others,
reported in 2008 (11) SCC 775, our Hon'ble Apex Court, has held as follows:
1