Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.24 seconds)Section 62 in The Electricity Act, 2003 [Entire Act]
M/S Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills Co. ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And Ors on 12 December, 1978
In M/s. Motilal
Padampat Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. V. State of Uttar
Pradesh and Others [1979 (2) SCC 409], it is held that
the Government is bound on principles of promissory
estoppel to make good the representations made by it. In
order to invoke the doctrine of promissory estoppel it is
enough to show that there existed a promise and acting in
reliance on the promise any person had altered his position
based on the belief induced by such representation.
Union Of India & Ors vs Godfrey Philips India Ltd. Etc. Etc on 30 September, 1985
In
Union of India and Others V. Godfrey Philips India Ltd.
[1985 (4) SCC 369] the apex court held that, principle of
W.P.(C)No.8902 of 2013 6
promissory estoppel will apply to any executive order of the
Government. In a case where the Government or any other
authority represents within its competence and the assessee
is acting upon such representation, the Government or such
other authorities are bound by promissory estoppel to grant
the exemption declared until it is revoked.
State Of Punjab vs M/S Nestle India Ltd. & Anr on 5 May, 2004
In a still recent
decision in State of Punjab V. Nestle India Ltd. and
Another [2004 (6) SCC 465] it is held that a citizen can
compel the Government to do in accordance with the
representation made, if factors necessary for founding a
plea of promissory estoppel is established.
1