Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.58 seconds)

Sri. Shadaksharappa vs Kumari Vijayalaxmi And Ors on 6 November, 2020

In my considered opinion, the impugned order passed by the Trial Court rejecting I.A.No.11 is not only contrary to the material on record, which indicates that there is a dispute regarding identity, location, encroachment etc., as can be seen from the rival contentions, but the impugned impugned order is also contrary to the well settled principles of law governing appointment of Court Commissioner and the recent judgment of this Court in the case of SHADAKSHARAPPA Vs. KUMARI VIJAYALAXMI - W.P.No.201274/2023 DATED 24.01.2023. Under these circumstances, I am of the considered opinion that the impugned -5- NC: 2023:KHC:19393 WP No. 14270 of 2021 order passed by the trial Court rejecting I.A.No.11 has occasioned failure of justice warranting interference of this Court in the present petition.
Karnataka High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 7 - A Oka - Full Document
1