Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.17 seconds)
Devagya Tuklya And Ors. vs Shivgya Igya And Ors. on 21 June, 1972 cites

Shiba Prasad Singh vs Rani Prayag Kumari Debi on 7 April, 1932

12. We would have come to the same opinion even without the aid of the decision of the Supreme Court in Puttarangamma's case, , and the decision of the Privy Council in Shiba Prasad Singh's case. AIR 1932 PC 216, on the basis of the text of Mitakshara which has come up for consideration before us. We however make it clear that while understanding the said text, we have relied upon the opinion of distinguished and erudite Sanskrit scholars who were at the same time eminent jurists such as Telang, J. and Dr. Jolly, in preference to the opinion of the three learned English Judges who were members of the Full Bench of the Bombay High Court.
Bombay High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 86 - Full Document

S.K. Subba Ayyar vs Pichumani Ayyar on 1 March, 1926

It is also true that the other High Courts, that is the Madras and Calcutta High Courts, have expressly dissented from the decision of the Bombay High Court, in the cases of Subba Ayyar v. Ganesa Ayyar, (1894) ILR 18 Mad 179 and Rameshwar v. Lachmi Prosad. (1903) ILR 31 Cal 111 (120). But although if is unfortunate that all the other High Courts have taken a different view from that taken by the Bombay High Court, and although it is a remarkable fact that every Hindu Judge has also taken a different view from that taken by the majority of the Full Bench in Bombay, still it seems to me that sitting alone, as I am here, I must consider myself as concluded by the Bombay Full Bench decision."
Madras High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 3 - Full Document
1