Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.39 seconds)
Krishak Bharat vs Union Of India And Ors on 7 August, 2015 cites

Radhey Shyam Gupta vs Punjab National Bank & Anr on 4 November, 2008

In response thereto, they on 10 th July, 2012 informed that in terms of Section 60(1)(g) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and as per the judgment in Radhey Shyam Gupta Vs. Punjab National Bank AIR 2009 SC 930, no recovery could be made from the ex-MPs. On 22nd January, 2013, the Lok Sabha Secretariat gave their no W.P.(C) No.4912/1998 Page 4 of 15 objection to disconnection of the telephone connections of the sitting MPs who were in arrears. The Lok Sabha Secretariat on 24 th May, 2013 also gave no objection to disconnection of water, electricity and telephone connections of sitting MPs who had failed to pay their dues. The Lok Sabha Secretariat on that date further informed that it was not possible to deduct and pay more than 10,000/- per month towards existing dues payable by the sitting Lok Sabha MP to the service providers / authorities. Vide order dated 26th July, 2013, order of disconnection of electricity, water and telephone facilities of the sitting Rajya Sabha Members in arrears was also made on the parity of the Lok Sabha.
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 86 - A Kabir - Full Document

Union Of India & Anr vs Assn.Of Unified Telecom S.P.Of ... on 11 October, 2011

5. During the pendency of this petition, the elections to Lok Sabha were due. The order dated 4th February, 2004 records that the Election Commission of India (ECI) in terms of the directions issued by the Supreme Court in Union of India Vs. Association for Democratic Reforms (2002) 5 SCC 294, had issued a direction requiring candidate seeking election to Parliament or State Legislature to along with his nomination form disclose the liabilities if any particularly of any overdues of any public financial institution or Government dues. Notice was issued to the ECI to show cause as to why no objection certificate was not insisted upon and whether the ECI W.P.(C) No.4912/1998 Page 5 of 15 was going to insist upon the said certificate in the then ensuing elections. The order dated 1st March, 2014 also records that ECI had issued an order dated 27th March, 2003 containing the form of the affidavit which a candidate along with his nomination papers was required to submit, giving particulars of the government dues owed by him. A direction was also issued for the ECI to before election widely advertise the government dues owed by each of the contesting candidates.
Supreme Court of India Cites 42 - Cited by 185 - A K Patnaik - Full Document

S.D. Bandi vs Divisional Traffic Officer, Ksrtc & Ors on 5 July, 2013

11. The Supreme Court recently in S.D. Bandi Vs. Divisional Traffic Officer KSRTC (2013) 12 SCC 631 faced with the issue of continued unauthorized occupation of government accommodation and non recovery of charges therefor inspite of existence of provisions / rules, directions, laws for dealing therewith, owing to use of influence by the defaulters / errants or taking advantage by them of the lengthy procedures provided under the laws, issued directions in the form of suggestions to address the issue. It was observed that since allotment of government accommodation is a privilege given to Ministers and Members of Parliament, action for breach of W.P.(C) No.4912/1998 Page 9 of 15 privilege would also lie. We, in formulating the directions hereunder given, have taken guidance therefrom as well.
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 81 - P Sathasivam - Full Document
1