Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 32 (0.37 seconds)Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 201 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 120B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 384 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 106 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
C. Muniappan & Ors vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 30 August, 2010
In C. Muniappan and Ors. v. State of Tamil Nadu JT 2010 (9) SC
95, the Supreme Court, had held that it is settled proposition of law
that even if there are some omissions, contradictions and discrepancies,
the entire evidence cannot be disregarded. After exercising care and
caution and sifting through the evidence to separate truth from
untruth, exaggeration and improvements, the court can come to
conclusion as to whether the residuary evidence is sufficient to convict
the accused. Thus, an undue importance could not be attached to
omissions, contradictions and discrepancies which do not go to the
heart of the matter and shake the basic version of the prosecution's
witness. As the mental abilities of a human being cannot be expected to
be attuned to absorb all the details of the incident, minor discrepancies
are bound to occur in the statements of witnesses.
Sohrab S/O Belinayata & Anr vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 2 May, 1972
Reliance can be
placed on Sohrab and Anr. v. The State of M.P., AIR 1972 SC 2020;
State of U.P. v. M.K. Anthony, AIR 1985 SC 48; Bharwada Bhogini Bhai
Hirji Bhai v. State of Gujarat, AIR 1983 SC 753; State of Rajasthan v.
Om Prakash, AIR 2007 SC 2257; Prithu @ Prithi Chand and Anr. v.
State of Himachal Pradesh, (2009) 11 SCC 588; State of U.P. v. Santosh
Kumar and Ors. (2009) 9 SCC 626 and State v. Saravanan and Anr,
AIR 2009 SC 151.
State Of U.P. vs M.K. Anthony on 6 November, 1984
Reliance can be
placed on Sohrab and Anr. v. The State of M.P., AIR 1972 SC 2020;
State of U.P. v. M.K. Anthony, AIR 1985 SC 48; Bharwada Bhogini Bhai
Hirji Bhai v. State of Gujarat, AIR 1983 SC 753; State of Rajasthan v.
Om Prakash, AIR 2007 SC 2257; Prithu @ Prithi Chand and Anr. v.
State of Himachal Pradesh, (2009) 11 SCC 588; State of U.P. v. Santosh
Kumar and Ors. (2009) 9 SCC 626 and State v. Saravanan and Anr,
AIR 2009 SC 151.