Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.52 seconds)
Bharti Anupama Anand & 5 vs State Of Gujarat & 2 on 20 February, 2014 cites

Secretary, State Of Karnataka And ... vs Umadevi And Others on 10 April, 2006

),   to   the   effect   that   ad­hoc   or  temporary   employees   should   not   be   replaced   by   other  ad­hoc or temporary employees, has not been touched by  the Larger Bench of the Supreme Court in  Secretary,  State   of   Karnataka   and   others   Vs.   Umadevi  (3)   and  others (Supra.).  It is submitted that this principle  of   law   still   prevails.
Supreme Court of India Cites 46 - Cited by 4959 - P K Balasubramanyan - Full Document

State Of Haryana And Ors. Etc. Etc vs Piara Singh And Ors. Etc. Etc on 12 August, 1992

31. It appears from the submissions made on behalf of  the GPSC that the requisition for filling up regular  posts   has   come   from   the   State   Government   on  07.08.2013. The procedure for regular recruitment is  still   underway   and,   as   per   the   submissions   made   by  Mr.D.G.Shukla, learned advocate for the GPSC, it may  take another 10 to 12 months to complete the same. It  may   be   true   that   the   petitioners   do   not   have   any  permanent right to the posts that they are occupying  on   ad­hoc   basis;   however,   it   is   difficult   to  understand   what   rational   purpose   would   be   served   in  terminating   the   services   of   the   petitioners   and  engaging fresh ad­hoc persons for eleven months. Such  action would be in contradiction to the principle of  law   laid   down   in   the   case   of  State   of   Haryana   and  others Vs. Piara Singh and others (Supra.)
Supreme Court of India Cites 19 - Cited by 1473 - B P Reddy - Full Document
1