Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.30 seconds)Section 110 in Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 [Entire Act]
Oriental Fire And General Insurance Co. ... vs Suman Navnath Rajguru And Ors. on 17 November, 1984
In view of the clear authority of the Division Bench decision of this Court in the case, of the Oriental Fire & General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Suman Navnath Rajguru (sypra) it is unnecessary to refer to other reported decisions.
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Padmanabhan Nair vs Narayanikutty And Anr. on 28 July, 1987
We might mention that in the case of Padmanabhan Nair v. Narayanikutty, 1988 (1) ACJ 58, Kerala High Court held compensation was payable in case of a death of a passenger who dies from fire caused from petrol carried by another passenger in a public bus. We note that the trend of these reported decisions is that the expression 'arising out of use of motor vehicle' ought to be given not restricted but wide meaning. We ought to bear in our mind the object of inserting Section 92-A in the statute was to
enlarge the right to receive compensation for death or permanent disablement in consequence of a motor accident.
Section 95 in Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 [Entire Act]
Pushpa Rani vs Anokha Singh Etc. on 19 May, 1975
In support of their view that motor vehicle even when stationary it is still in use relied upon the views expressed by the Queens Bench in Elliott v. Grey, 1959 (3), All England Law Reports, 733 and by Delhi High Court in the case of Pushpa Rani Chopra v. Anokha Singh, 1975 ACJ 396.
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939
1