Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.02 seconds)Section 120B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 465 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Jang Singh And Ors. vs State Of Punjab And Ors. on 18 August, 1997
4. The revision against the judgment dated 9.5.2012 passed by the
learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fatehgarh Sahib in respect of FIR No.97
dated 18.12.1996 registered under Sections 420, 465, 120-B of the IPC PS
Bassi Pathana was fixed for 4.12.2012. The present application was moved
in the said revision petition. However, that revision petition was dismissed
as withdrawn but the argument in the present criminal misc petition were
addressed by the learned counsel for the petitioner on that day and the case
was reserved on the decision whether the sentences can be made concurrent
in the above said two FIRs. The Full Bench of this Court reported in
Jang Singh versus State of Punjab reported in 2008(1) RCR
(Criminal ) page 323 lays down the law regarding making the sentence
concurrent as under :-
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Sameer Ahmad And Others vs State Of Haryana on 7 January, 2010
5. The said authority has been relied upon by this court in ruling
Sameer Ahmad and others versus State of Haryana reported in 2010
(2) RCR (Criminal) page 612 and by Division Bench of this Court in
authority Pritam Singh vs. State of Punjab reported in 2007 (4) RCR
(Criminal) page 712 in which it has been held that in appropriate case
provision of Section 427 Cr.P.C. making the sentence concurrent can be
ordered on the facts of the said cases.
Pritam Singh And Anr. vs The State Of Punjab on 4 November, 1955
6. Both the FIRs referred to above relate to same nature of case
and accused has been convicted in both the cases. The revision against one
of the cases was pending.
1