Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.21 seconds)Section 67 in Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments Act, 1997 [Entire Act]
Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments Act, 1997
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 20 in Madras Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1951 [Entire Act]
Section 38 in Madras Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1951 [Entire Act]
Section 67 in Madras Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1951 [Entire Act]
State Of Up & Ors vs Harish Chandra & Ors on 12 April, 1996
In State of U.P. v. Harish Chandra [(1996) 9
SCC 309] the Apex Court held that no mandamus can be
issued to direct the Government to refrain from enforcing the
provisions of law or to do something which is contrary to law.
Madras Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1951
A.B.Bhaskara Rao vs Inspector Of Police,Cbi Vishakpatnam on 23 September, 2011
In Bhaskara Rao A.B. v. CBI [(2011) 10 SCC 259] the
Apex Court reiterated that, generally, no Court has
competence to issue a direction contrary to law nor can the
Court direct an authority to act in contravention of the
statutory provisions. The courts are meant to enforce the rule
of law and not to pass the orders or directions which are
contrary to what has been injected by law.