Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.36 seconds)
Smt. Sudha vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 27 October, 2023 cites

Ram Kumar Gijroya vs Delhi Sub. Services Selection Bd. & Anr on 24 February, 2016

13.In the light of judgment passed by the Supreme Court in the case of Ram Kumar Gijroya vs. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board and another reported in (2016) 4 SCC 754, Karn Singh Yadav vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Others reported in 2020 SCC OnLine SC 1472 (two-Judges) and 2022 SCC OnLine SC 1341 (three- Judges), Charles K. Skaria and Others vs. Dr. C. Mathew and Others reported in (1980) 2 SCC 752, Dolly Chhanda vs. Chairman, JEE and Others reported in (2005) 9 SCC 779, Dheerender Singh Paliwal vs. Union Public Service Commission reported in (2017) 11 SCC 276, Alok Kumar Singh and Others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others reported in (2018) 18 SCC 242 and Deepak Yadav and Others vs. Union Public Service Commission and Another reported in (2021) SCC OnLine SC 709 mere submission of the documents at a later stage would not make him ineligible. However, the law is that in case if the minimum qualification was acquired after the cutoff date or the last date of submission of application form then 7 such candidate will not be eligible. Since the respondent no.5 had already passed class V examination much prior to the advertisement and merely because her mark-sheet was filed at a later stage, this Court is of the considered opinion that no error was committed by the authorities by taking the mark-sheet of the respondent no.5 into consideration.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 216 - V G Gowda - Full Document

Karn Singh Yadav vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi on 28 September, 2022

13.In the light of judgment passed by the Supreme Court in the case of Ram Kumar Gijroya vs. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board and another reported in (2016) 4 SCC 754, Karn Singh Yadav vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Others reported in 2020 SCC OnLine SC 1472 (two-Judges) and 2022 SCC OnLine SC 1341 (three- Judges), Charles K. Skaria and Others vs. Dr. C. Mathew and Others reported in (1980) 2 SCC 752, Dolly Chhanda vs. Chairman, JEE and Others reported in (2005) 9 SCC 779, Dheerender Singh Paliwal vs. Union Public Service Commission reported in (2017) 11 SCC 276, Alok Kumar Singh and Others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others reported in (2018) 18 SCC 242 and Deepak Yadav and Others vs. Union Public Service Commission and Another reported in (2021) SCC OnLine SC 709 mere submission of the documents at a later stage would not make him ineligible. However, the law is that in case if the minimum qualification was acquired after the cutoff date or the last date of submission of application form then 7 such candidate will not be eligible. Since the respondent no.5 had already passed class V examination much prior to the advertisement and merely because her mark-sheet was filed at a later stage, this Court is of the considered opinion that no error was committed by the authorities by taking the mark-sheet of the respondent no.5 into consideration.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 8 - Full Document

Dolly Chhanda vs Chairman, Jee & Ors on 5 October, 2004

13.In the light of judgment passed by the Supreme Court in the case of Ram Kumar Gijroya vs. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board and another reported in (2016) 4 SCC 754, Karn Singh Yadav vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Others reported in 2020 SCC OnLine SC 1472 (two-Judges) and 2022 SCC OnLine SC 1341 (three- Judges), Charles K. Skaria and Others vs. Dr. C. Mathew and Others reported in (1980) 2 SCC 752, Dolly Chhanda vs. Chairman, JEE and Others reported in (2005) 9 SCC 779, Dheerender Singh Paliwal vs. Union Public Service Commission reported in (2017) 11 SCC 276, Alok Kumar Singh and Others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others reported in (2018) 18 SCC 242 and Deepak Yadav and Others vs. Union Public Service Commission and Another reported in (2021) SCC OnLine SC 709 mere submission of the documents at a later stage would not make him ineligible. However, the law is that in case if the minimum qualification was acquired after the cutoff date or the last date of submission of application form then 7 such candidate will not be eligible. Since the respondent no.5 had already passed class V examination much prior to the advertisement and merely because her mark-sheet was filed at a later stage, this Court is of the considered opinion that no error was committed by the authorities by taking the mark-sheet of the respondent no.5 into consideration.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 362 - Full Document

Shri Dheerender Singh Paliwal vs Union Public Service Commission on 9 December, 2009

13.In the light of judgment passed by the Supreme Court in the case of Ram Kumar Gijroya vs. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board and another reported in (2016) 4 SCC 754, Karn Singh Yadav vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Others reported in 2020 SCC OnLine SC 1472 (two-Judges) and 2022 SCC OnLine SC 1341 (three- Judges), Charles K. Skaria and Others vs. Dr. C. Mathew and Others reported in (1980) 2 SCC 752, Dolly Chhanda vs. Chairman, JEE and Others reported in (2005) 9 SCC 779, Dheerender Singh Paliwal vs. Union Public Service Commission reported in (2017) 11 SCC 276, Alok Kumar Singh and Others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others reported in (2018) 18 SCC 242 and Deepak Yadav and Others vs. Union Public Service Commission and Another reported in (2021) SCC OnLine SC 709 mere submission of the documents at a later stage would not make him ineligible. However, the law is that in case if the minimum qualification was acquired after the cutoff date or the last date of submission of application form then 7 such candidate will not be eligible. Since the respondent no.5 had already passed class V examination much prior to the advertisement and merely because her mark-sheet was filed at a later stage, this Court is of the considered opinion that no error was committed by the authorities by taking the mark-sheet of the respondent no.5 into consideration.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 0 - Cited by 5 - Full Document
1