Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 58 (0.26 seconds)Section 108 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882
Section 110 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 13 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
The Companies Act, 1956
Section 620 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 137 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Section 110 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Vasudev Ramchandra Shelat vs Pranlal Jayanand Thakar And Ors on 17 July, 1974
Relying on the judgment of this Court in
Vasudev Ramchandra Shelat v. Pranlal Jayanand Thaker and Ors. it
is pointed out that a transfer of property in securities, which is recognised by
the TP Act, may be antecedent to the actual vesting of all or the full rights of
ownership of shares and exercise of the rights of a shareholder in accordance
with the provisions of company law. The antecedent transfer of title in the
security results in the equitable right of the transferee to be registered by the
company. Learned counsel contended that as a result of delivery of the
original LOA accompanied by the blank transfer deed, CMF acquired
ownership rights including the equitable right as against NPCL to have its
name registered as the owner. Strongly refuting the argument of Mr.
Jethmalani, Mr. Kapadia contended that since delivery of securities
accompanied by a blank transfer deed was a common practice in the trade,
there was no occasion for alarm bells ringing merely because the original
LOA accompanied by blank transfer deed was delivered to CMF. In our
view, notwithstanding the market practice of delivery of securities
accompanied by a signed blank transfer deed, the property in the securities
can only be transferred if there is bona fide purchase of the same for value.
The crucial question in the present case is: did CMF purchase the suit bonds
for value from the antecedent title holder?