Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.81 seconds)

Mrs. Rekha Chaturvedi vs University Of Rajasthan And Ors on 13 January, 1993

"6. .....The proposition that where applications are called for prescribing a particular date as the last date for filing the applications, the eligibility of the candidates shall have to be judged with reference to that date and that date alone, is a well-established one. A person who acquires the prescribed qualification subsequent to such prescribed date cannot be considered at all. An advertisement or notification issued/published ::: Downloaded on - 09/06/2013 16:05:40 ::: wp1489.10.odt 27/31 calling for applications constitutes a representation to the public and the authority issuing it is bound by such representation. It cannot act contrary to it. One reason behind this proposition is that if it were known that persons who obtained the qualifications after the prescribed date but before the date of interview would be allowed to appear for the interview, other similarly placed persons could also have applied. Just because some of the persons had applied notwithstanding that they had not acquired the prescribed qualifications by the prescribed date, they could not have been treated on a preferential basis. Their applications ought to have been rejected at the inception itself. This proposition is indisputable and in fact was not doubted or disputed in the majority judgment. This is also the proposition affirmed in Rekha Chaturvedi v. University of Rajasthan. ...."
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 328 - P B Sawant - Full Document
1