Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 27 (0.81 seconds)Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Masalti vs State Of U. P on 4 May, 1964
While dealing with the question whether such version could be relied upon
in view of the decision of this Court in Masalti v. State of U.P.1, the Trial
Court observed that it would be unsafe to rely on the evidence of witnesses
who speak in general and omnibus way without any specific reference to the
overt acts committed by them but PW12 Sarojini had given specific names
of accused and attributed specific overt acts to those accused.
State Of U.P vs Dan Singh And Ors on 3 February, 1997
In State of U.P. v. Dan Singh (supra) fourteen persons
were killed. Six were burnt alive in a house that was set on fire, while other
eight were killed in the mob assault. According to witness Nari Ram,
accused Dan Singh and Ram Singh were spraying kerosene on the house
while Jasod Singh and Gosain Singh were putting the house on fire. This
Court found the aforesaid named accused, who were ascribed specific roles,
28
to have set the house on fire and responsible for killing of six persons who
died as a result of burns.