Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.27 seconds)

Smt. Mousumi Banerjee vs Sri Bidyut Kumar Banerjee on 11 September, 2009

3. civil cam 119-16 291-18.doc already paid. In our opinion, the said application is thoroughly misconceived and merit-less. Firstly, there is nothing on record to suggest that the wife did not allow the daughters to meet the husband. Secondly, in order to ensure that whatever be the bitter disputes between the husband and the wife, at least the daughters should have connect the father, we had requested the presence of the daughters before us. Accordingly, in privacy of our Chamber, we have spoken to the daughters for a long time. They had shown disinclination to meet the father. They cited the reasons which are not necessary for us to record in this order. Suffice it to say, from our dialogue with the daughters, it was not possible for us to conclude that the daughters' reluctance to meet the father was engineered by the mother. Whatever be their hurt, disappointment or even teenage imprudence, in our opinion, no law liberates the father from the responsibility to take care of the children and to support them. Secondly, we do not think that the Calcutta High Court in the said judgment in case of Mousumi Banerjee (supra) has laid down any proposition of such a nature. Under these circumstances, we reject the contention of the 8 of 10
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 4 - Cited by 3 - B Bhattacharya - Full Document
1