Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.39 seconds)Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 406 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 494 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 227 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Juwarsingh S/O Bheraji And Ors. vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 18 September, 1980
22. Hon'ble Apex Court in the case titled as Juwarsingh V.
State of Madhya Pradesh 1980 (supp) SCC 417 in para 5
held that cross-examination is not the only way to
discrediting witness. As such, this Court is of the view that
there is nothing on record to attract the provisions of
Section 494 IPC qua accused Arun Pathak. Though, ld.
Trial Court has ordered for framing of charge under
Sections 406/494/34 IPC with other offence, it has to be
kept in mind and seen that Section 34 IPC cannot be
attracted in view of the facts and circumstances of present
case.
Bharat Parikh vs C.B.I. And Anr on 14 July, 2008
Reference
may be made to the cases reported as Bharat Parikh Vs.
CBI & Anr.) [2009 (I) AD (Crl.)
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Smt. Bhagwanti Devi And Anr vs State Of Haryana And Anr on 19 January, 1994
SC 190]; Bhagwanti Vs.
State [2002 (1) JCC 127] and Kanti Bhadra Shah & Anr.
Vs. State of West Bengal [AIR 2000 SC 522].
Kanti Bhadra Shah And Anr vs State Of West Bengal on 5 January, 2000
SC 190]; Bhagwanti Vs.
State [2002 (1) JCC 127] and Kanti Bhadra Shah & Anr.
Vs. State of West Bengal [AIR 2000 SC 522].