Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.16 seconds)Section 71 in The Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Dr. Vivekanand Atmaram Chitale And ... vs Vidya Vardhini Sabha And Others on 24 January, 1984
In Vivekanand (supra), Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal
(MRT) passed an order exercising powers under Section 71 of the
Bombay Public Trusts Act. The said order was not complied by the
respondents. The petitioners, therefore, initiated contempt
proceedings. This Court at Principal Seat held that MRT has no
jurisdiction to pass the said order. Therefore, non-compliance of the
said order did not amount to contempt of Court. Notices issued to
the respondents were discharged as there was no contempt.
K.S. Jhunjhunwala And Another vs Tayebhai Mohammedbhai Bagasapwalla ... on 31 October, 1996
In Jhunjhunwala (supra), the learned Single Judge of this
Court has held as under :-
Chiranjilal Shrilal Goenka (Deceased) ... vs Jasjit Singh And Ors on 18 March, 1993
1984 Mh LJ 520 : 1985 Cri LJ 359 (cited supra) dealing with
the case of violation of interim injunction or of the judgment
reported in MANU/SC/0496/1993:[1993]2SCR454,
Chiranjilal Shrilal Goenka v. Jasjit Singh, should not be made
applicable to the present case. If this is not so, then one has to
imagine the serious consequences when there are so many
Courts/Tribunals vested with different jurisdictions. There
may be a Court/Tribunal ready to oblige a particular person
with a favourable order. If it is held to be binding on the other
party, though without jurisdiction, then other party would be
required to face serious consequences."
1