Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.25 seconds)
Shaik Abdul Rashidullah vs Shaik Parveen Sulthana Begum on 6 June, 2018 cites

Kulbhushan Kumar vs Raj Kumari & Anr on 20 October, 1970

Even assuming for a moment, the petitioner is earning Rs.8,000/- per month, without considering the bank statement, the first respondent being the wife is entitled to claim maintenance 20% of the income of the petitioner towards maintenance in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in Dr. Kulbhushan Kumar v. Raj Kumari and another1 and the same was reiterated in Kalyan Dey Chowdhury v. Rita Dey Chowdhury Nee Nandy2. Therefore, the interim maintenance awarded @ Rs.2,000/- to the first respondent and Rs.1,000/- each to the respondents 2 and 3 is not excessive in terms of the Judgment of the Apex Court.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 115 - G K Mitter - Full Document

Kalyan Dey Chowdhury vs Rita Dey Chowdhury Nee Nandy on 19 April, 2017

Even assuming for a moment, the petitioner is earning Rs.8,000/- per month, without considering the bank statement, the first respondent being the wife is entitled to claim maintenance 20% of the income of the petitioner towards maintenance in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in Dr. Kulbhushan Kumar v. Raj Kumari and another1 and the same was reiterated in Kalyan Dey Chowdhury v. Rita Dey Chowdhury Nee Nandy2. Therefore, the interim maintenance awarded @ Rs.2,000/- to the first respondent and Rs.1,000/- each to the respondents 2 and 3 is not excessive in terms of the Judgment of the Apex Court.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 155 - R Banumathi - Full Document
1