Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.21 seconds)International Airport Authority Of ... vs International Air Cargo Workers' ... on 13 April, 2009
33. Management has relied upon International Airport Authority of
India Vs. International Air Cargo Workers' Union and Another 2009 IV
LLJ 31 (SC), wherein it was held that in the absence of a notification
under section 10 of CLRA Act, 1970 prohibiting the employment of
contract labour in the operation of cargo handling work, the workmen
employed as contract labour are not entitled to claim absorption.
Delhi Cloth & General Mills Co., Ltd vs Workmen And Ors. Etc on 27 September, 1968
35. During the course of arguments, Ld. Counsel/AR for workmen
took an objection that the engagement of contractors is sham camouflage.
However, this is not the issue as referred by the appropriate government to
this Tribunal and in my considered opinion, U/s 10(4) of Industrial
Disputes Act, this Tribunal must confine its jurisdiction to the points
referred to it and the matters incidental thereto. Reference in this regard is
had to the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Delhi Cloth and General
Mills Co. Ltd. vs. Workmen and others, 1969, AIR SC 243, wherein
Hon'ble Supreme Court observed as follows:-
State Of Haryana & Ors vs Charanjit Singh & Ors., Etc. Etc on 5 October, 2005
In State of Haryana and Others vs. Charanjit Singh and Others
etc AIR 2006 SC 161, it has been held by Hon'ble Supreme Court as
under:-
The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
1