Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.22 seconds)Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Union Of India vs Op (Cat).Nos.11 Of 202 on 27 February, 2020
We do
not approve the contrary view taken by the
Full Bench of the Andhra Pradesh High Court
in the case of Principal Accountant-General,
Andhra Pradesh (supra) and the decisions of
the Kerala High Court in the case of Union of
India Vs. Pavithran (O.P.(CAT) No.
111/2020 decided on 22.11.2022) and the
Himachal Pradesh High Court in the case of
Hari Prakash Vs. State of Himachal
Page 26 of 28
Pradesh & Ors. (CWP No. 2503/2016
decided on 06.11.2020).
Principal Accountant General And Anr. vs C. Subba Rao on 27 January, 2005
We do
not approve the contrary view taken by the
Full Bench of the Andhra Pradesh High Court
in the case of Principal Accountant-General,
Andhra Pradesh (supra) and the decisions of
the Kerala High Court in the case of Union of
India Vs. Pavithran (O.P.(CAT) No.
111/2020 decided on 22.11.2022) and the
Himachal Pradesh High Court in the case of
Hari Prakash Vs. State of Himachal
Page 26 of 28
Pradesh & Ors. (CWP No. 2503/2016
decided on 06.11.2020).
Article 43 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Hari Prakash R vs State Of Himachal Pradesh & Ors on 6 November, 2020
We do
not approve the contrary view taken by the
Full Bench of the Andhra Pradesh High Court
in the case of Principal Accountant-General,
Andhra Pradesh (supra) and the decisions of
the Kerala High Court in the case of Union of
India Vs. Pavithran (O.P.(CAT) No.
111/2020 decided on 22.11.2022) and the
Himachal Pradesh High Court in the case of
Hari Prakash Vs. State of Himachal
Page 26 of 28
Pradesh & Ors. (CWP No. 2503/2016
decided on 06.11.2020).
Yogendra Singh Bhadauria vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 22 September, 2020
We are in complete agreement with the view
taken by the Madras High Court in the case
of P. Ayyamperumal (supra); the Delhi High
Page 25 of 28
Court in the case of Gopal Singh (supra); the
Allahabad High Court in the case of Nand
Vijay Singh (supra); the Madhya Pradesh
High Court in the case of Yogendra Singh
Bhadauria (supra); the Orissa High Court in
the case of AFR Arun Kumar Biswal (supra);
and the Gujarat High Court in the case of
Takhatsinh Udesinh Songara (supra).
The State Of Gujarat vs Takhatsinh Udesinh Songara on 30 September, 2022
We are in complete agreement with the view
taken by the Madras High Court in the case
of P. Ayyamperumal (supra); the Delhi High
Page 25 of 28
Court in the case of Gopal Singh (supra); the
Allahabad High Court in the case of Nand
Vijay Singh (supra); the Madhya Pradesh
High Court in the case of Yogendra Singh
Bhadauria (supra); the Orissa High Court in
the case of AFR Arun Kumar Biswal (supra);
and the Gujarat High Court in the case of
Takhatsinh Udesinh Songara (supra).
1