Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 28 (0.25 seconds)Smt. Nilabati Behera Alias Lalit Behera ... vs State Of Orissa And Ors on 24 March, 1993
The anguish expressed in Gauri Shanker Sharma v. State of U. P. (AIR 1990 SC 709), Bhagwan Singh and Anr. v. State of Punjab (1992 (3) SCC 249), Smt. Nilabati Behera @ Lalita Behera v. State of Orissa and Ors. (AIR 1993 SC 1960), Pratul Kumar Sinha v. State of Bihar and Anr. (1994 Supp.
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Shyamsunder Trivedi And Ors on 9 May, 1995
(3) SCC 100), Kewal Pati (Smt.) v. State of U. P. and Ors. (1995 (3) SCC 600), Inder Singh v. State of Punjab and Ors. (1995 (3) SCC 702), State of M. P. v. Shyamsunder Trivedi and Ors. (1995 (4) SCC 262) and by now celebrated decision in D. K. Basu v. State of West Bengal (1997 (1) SCC 416) seems to have caused not even any softening attitude to the inhuman approach in dealing with persons in custody.
Section 120B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Shri D.K. Basu,Ashok K. Johri vs State Of West Bengal,State Of U.P on 18 December, 1996
(3) SCC 100), Kewal Pati (Smt.) v. State of U. P. and Ors. (1995 (3) SCC 600), Inder Singh v. State of Punjab and Ors. (1995 (3) SCC 702), State of M. P. v. Shyamsunder Trivedi and Ors. (1995 (4) SCC 262) and by now celebrated decision in D. K. Basu v. State of West Bengal (1997 (1) SCC 416) seems to have caused not even any softening attitude to the inhuman approach in dealing with persons in custody.
Nikesh Tarachand Shah vs Union Of India on 23 November, 2017
"5. The historical background of the provision for bail has been elaborately and lucidly explained in a recent decision delivered in Nikesh Tarachand Shah v. Union of India: 2017 (13) SCALE 609 going back to the days of the Magna Carta.
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia Etc vs State Of Punjab on 9 April, 1980
In that decision, reference was made to Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab: (1980) 2 SCC 565 in which it is observed that it was held way back in Nagendra v. King-Emperor: AIR 1924 Cal 476 that bail is not to be withheld as a punishment.
Nagendra Nath Chakrabarthi vs King-Emperor on 1 October, 1923
In that decision, reference was made to Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab: (1980) 2 SCC 565 in which it is observed that it was held way back in Nagendra v. King-Emperor: AIR 1924 Cal 476 that bail is not to be withheld as a punishment.
Emperor vs H.L. Hutchinson on 23 April, 1931
Reference was also made to Emperor v. Hutchinson: AIR 1931 All 356 wherein it was observed that grant of bail is the rule and refusal is the exception. The provision for bail is therefore age-old and the liberal interpretation to the provision for bail is almost a century old, going back to colonial days.