Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.30 seconds)Section 139 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 138 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 142 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 188 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 200 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 397 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
K. Prakashan vs P.K. Surenderan on 10 October, 2007
by
'examiiiiilig the official 'ovt'7--'the sales tax department" to Show that
hosvale=.was"shoivh in the repayment bill produced by the
' " .. V eompiaiharit. ii€jit'ltaie1' bearing his signature or signature of the
afleeused, the. non-production of the accounts books or stock
'~.V:1'tegisltelr';«,'held that the Cheques were not issued ford the
dischaitge of the liability. So also the Couhsei has also relied
V "o§§"iti'1e decision of the Apex Court in 2003(1) sec (Criminal)
13 Cri.RP 487/07'
200 (K. Prakashan Vs. P.K. Surendaran). wherein in Apex
Court has reiterated the principie that burden of proof lyingcorl
the accused required to be discharged by prepO_1f§der.ar1--ee5
probability and not by proving beyond reasonab.1~e----déoiuybtfiii «
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
1