Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.64 seconds)Section 326 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 106 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 304 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 161 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 164 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda vs State Of Maharashtra on 17 July, 1984
In the case of Sharad Birdhichand Sarda vs. State of Maharashtra ,
reported in (1984) 4 SCC 116, it has been held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court
of India that - "While dealing with circumstantial evidence, it has been held that
the onus was on the prosecution to prove that the chain is complete and the
infirmity or lacuna in prosecution cannot be cured by false defence or plea. The
conditions precedent before conviction could be based on circumstantial
evidence, must be fully established. They are -
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
State Of U.P vs Satish on 8 February, 2005
29. A similar view has been reiterated by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case
of State of U.P. vs. Satish, reported in (2005) 3 SCC 114 and Pawan vs.
State of Uttaranchal, reported in (2009) 15 SCC 259.