Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.19 seconds)Gaya Prasad Pathak vs Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax ... on 12 February, 2007
As the first question of law involved in the matter with regard
to jurisdiction of the Appellate Tribunal to interfere into an
authorization issued under Section 132-A has already been dealt with
and decided in the case of Gaya Prasad Pathak (supra), we have no
hesitation in holding and answering the issue No. 1 in favour of the
revenue for the same grounds and reasons which have already been
considered and decided by this Court in the case of Gaya Prasad
Pathak (supra). Accordingly, the answer of question No. 1 by
holding that the Tribunal had no jurisdiction or authority to interfere
with and quash a warrant of authorization issued under Section 132-
A of the Income Tax Act for the simple reasons that an requisition
issued under Section 132-A is not a proceeding for the assessment
and is, therefore, beyond the jurisdiction of Tribunal while
considering the question of assessment. Once issue No. 1 which was
dealt with by the Tribunal is answered in favour of the department
the second question need not be answered now as it has not been
gone into by the Tribunal after answering the issue No. 1 in favour
of the assessee.
Section 253 in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 268 in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 13 in The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
1