Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 48 (1.17 seconds)State(Gnct Of Delhi) vs Narender on 6 January, 2014
25. As courts below have proceeded to refuse release of seized vehicle of applicant by placing reliance upon judgement of Apex Court in State (NCT of Delhi) Vs. Narender (supra) without decideing their jurisdiction to entertain the release application, filed by applicant seeking release of seized vehicle in terms of section 457 of Code, the orders impugned in present application cannot be sustained on account of erroneous reasoning and therefore, liable to be quashed.
Section 457 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Delhi Excise Act, 2009
Section 61 in The Delhi Excise Act, 2009 [Entire Act]
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
State Of Karnataka vs K.A. Kunchindammed on 16 April, 2002
24) The argument raised that the judgment in Narender is not applicable to the present case cannot be accepted as the criminal court before whom the prosecution is lodged, will not have jurisdiction to release anything or animal whether interim or final as the Act in question has provisions contrary to the provisions contained in the Code. This Court in Narender relied upon the judgment in State of Karnataka v. K. A. Kunchindammed 10 and held as under:
Section 451 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Virendra Gupta vs State Of U.P. on 31 August, 2018
In order to appreciate the above, reference be made to the observations made by a learned Single Judge of this Court in Virendra Gupta Vs. State of U.P. 2018 (105) ACC 518 wherein Court has observed as under in paragraphs 16 and 17:-