Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.17 seconds)
K.P.Noushad vs State Of Kerala on 8 November, 2012 cites

K.M. Chinnappa, T.N. Godavarman ... vs Union Of India And Ors on 30 October, 2002

5. It is not even disputed by the leaned counsel for of the appellant that Ext.P1 impugned order is based on the directions of the Apex Court on the interlocutory application filed by Mr.Dileep as referred to above. The entire issue is whether the Central Empowered Committee's report which came up for consideration before the Apex Court should be the guiding factor or not, while considering the issuance or continuance of the licence or No Objection Certificate issued to the wood based industries.
Supreme Court of India Cites 33 - Cited by 133 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Union Of India & Ors vs Ramesh Gandhi on 14 November, 2011

"20. We have meticulously examined the judgment of this Court dated 18.03.1997. The entire controversy in the said judgment revolved only around the authority of the Coal Controller to issue the various directions such as were given by him on 24.4.1994. On an examination of the relevant provisions of law, this Court no doubt held that the Coal Controller was legally competent to issue the said directions. That the private company had already committed breach of contractual obligations arising under the two contracts was not at issue. There is no discussion in that regard in the said judgment.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 104 - Full Document
1