Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 38 (6.25 seconds)Section 30 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
The Punjab Municipal Act, 1999
Mahomed Musa vs Aghore Kumar Ganguli on 25 November, 1914
35. It is clear from the later pronouncement of the Privy Council that the observations in the earlier cases of Mahomed Musa v. Aghore Kumar Ganguli and Malraju Lakshmi Venkayamma v. Venkata Narasimha Appa Rao were mere obiter and can have no application to the facts of the present case.
G.F.C. Ariff vs Rai Jadunath Majumdar Bahadur on 23 January, 1931
I have had occasion in the earlier part of this judgment to state that this case has been dissented from in Ariff v. Jadunath Majumdar : see the observations of Lord Russell of Killowen at pp. 103 and 104 of his judgment.
Section 23 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882
Section 30 in Government of India Act, 1935 [Entire Act]
Section 19A in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Malraju Lakshmi Venkayyamma vs Venkata Narsinha Appa Rao on 15 May, 1916
35. It is clear from the later pronouncement of the Privy Council that the observations in the earlier cases of Mahomed Musa v. Aghore Kumar Ganguli and Malraju Lakshmi Venkayamma v. Venkata Narasimha Appa Rao were mere obiter and can have no application to the facts of the present case.