Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.27 seconds)Section 108 in The Customs Act, 1962 [Entire Act]
State Of Bihar vs Ramesh Singh on 2 August, 1977
(Emphasis supplied)
Again, in State of Bihar v. Ramesh Singh, (AIR 1977 S.C. 2018), the Court observed :
Nirmaljit Singh Hoon vs The State Of West Bengal And Anr on 6 September, 1972
In Nirmaljit Singh Hoon v. State of West Bengal, (AIR 1972 S.C. 2639) referring to Sections 202 and 203 of the Code, court said :
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947
Section 120B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 465 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Badat And Co vs East India Trading Co on 10 May, 1963
In support of the contention that there is no proof as required Under Section 78, Evidence Act counsel referred to Badat & Co. v. East India Trading, Co. (A.I.R. 1964 S.C. 538). Section 78(6) deals with proof of certain 'class of pubnc documents in a foreign country'. Section embodies a general Rule. A special Rule is enacted in Section 139 of the Customs Act. Section 139 of the Customs Act raises a presumption in respect of a document, 'received from any place outside India in the course of investigation of any offence alleged to have been committed by any person under that Act'. The Section further states [Section 139(ii)(b)] that 'Court shall admit the document in evidence...'.