Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.21 seconds)

S.Rajesh Kannan vs The Inspector General Of Police on 3 November, 2022

3. The respondents have filed a counter contending that the Court of Inquiry was ordered to enquire into the circumstances under which the firing incident took place and it is not the authority to consider that which category is applicable to the petitioner for receiving pension. The authority concerned, now concluded that the petitioner is entitled for benefits only category 'D' and therefore, this Court cannot interpret it in a different angle. It is further submitted that the petitioner was invalidated only on his personal request. Even though, the Court of Inquiry concluded on 26.01.2012 that the petitioner will get all financial benefits, if he is invalidated out from service due to injury under category 'E'. But, the petitioner had himself exchanged the service as such not entitled for benefit under category 'E'. In fact, the deceased family members was provided benefits only under category 'D'. He also relied upon the judgment of this Court in WP.No.13953 of 2021 S.Rajesh Kannan vs. The Inspector General of Police, Karnataka dated 03.11.2022, in which this Court held as follows:
Madras High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A Quddhose - Full Document
1