Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.23 seconds)

Aji @ Sasidharan vs State Of Kerala on 5 August, 2011

In Sasidharan's case (supra), learned Single Judge had occasion to consider an appeal preferred from the Central Prison by a convict for an offence under Section 55(a) of the Act. Facts in the case showed that though properties were seized by PW5 in the case from the accused and it reached the court on 16.05.1998, he had not drawn any sample from the alleged contraband. It was also found that PWs 3 and 4 were also in charge of the investigation. None of the officers made a requisition to the court to draw sample from the contraband produced in the court. Further, no forwarding note was submitted before the court requesting the learned Magistrate to take and forward sample for chemical analysis. In this factual background, learned Single Judge observed that the prosecution should fail in the absence of evidence regarding as to who drew the sample for chemical examination and on what date the sample was despatched to the Chemical Examiner's Laboratory.
Kerala High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 1 - B P Ray - Full Document
1