Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.18 seconds)
Hindustan Antibiotics Ltd. vs Hindustan Antibiotic Workers Union on 21 February, 2013 cites

S.G. Chemical And Dyes Trading ... vs S.G. Chemicals And Dyes Trading Limited ... on 3 April, 1986

14. Secondly, the Labour Court travelled outside the scope of  reference by examining whether the closure was in fact a closure  or a ruse for transferring the employees out side the Jabalpur to  the places such as Bhopal, Indore and far of places like Imphal.  In our view the Labour Court was bound to adjudicate on the  question   whether   the   retrenchment   is   valid   and   legal   and  nothing else unless of­course the question of validity of closure  was also referred to it by the Government.   The learned Single  Judge committed an error in upholding the said order by not only  upholding   the   order   of   Labour   Court   which   had   exceeded   its  jurisdiction   but   further   observed   that   the   retrenchment   was  improper because this was the case of shifting of business from  Jabalpur   to   Indore   and   that   provisions   of   Section   25   O   would  apply to this case.  The learned Single Judge wrongly relied on the  decision in S.G. Chemicals and Dyes Trading Employees' Union  v. S.G. Chemicals and Dyes Trading Limited and another [(1986)  2 SCC 624], which had no application to the present case at all.  That judgment laid down the law regarding functional integrity  of the undertakings of a establishment and may have been rightly  applied, if the question of validity of the closure was involved
Supreme Court of India Cites 49 - Cited by 135 - D P Madon - Full Document
1