Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.34 seconds)

Union Of India vs All India Services Pensioners ... on 14 January, 1988

In Union of India v. All India Services Pensioners' Association (1988) 2 SCC 580 this Court has given reasons for dismissing the special leave petition. When such reasons are given, the decision becomes one which attracts Article 141 of the Constitution which provides that the law declared by the Supreme Court shall be binding on all the courts within the territory of India. It, therefore, follows that when no reason is given, but a special leave petition is dismissed simpliciter, it cannot be said that there has been a declaration of law by this Court under Article 141 of the Constitution."
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 104 - E S Venkataramiah - Full Document

Supreme Court Employees' Welfare ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr. on 24 July, 1989

45. Observing that when a Special Leave Petition is dismissed by a non-speaking order, by such dismissal, the Supreme Court does not lay down any law as Item 46/C-V OA No.441/2016 envisaged under Article 141 of the Constitution of India in Supreme Court Employees Welfare Association v. Union of India and Others (1989) 4 SCC 187, this Court held as under:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 49 - Cited by 588 - M M Dutt - Full Document

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd vs State Of Bihar & Ors on 13 August, 1986

In Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. v. State of Bihar (1986) 4 SCC 146 it has been held by this Court that the dismissal of a special leave petition in limine by a non-speaking order does not justify any inference that, by necessary implication, the contentions raised in the special leave petition on the merits of the case have been rejected by the Supreme Court. It has been further held that the effect of a non-speaking order of dismissal of a special leave petition without anything more indicating the grounds or reasons of its dismissal must, by necessary implication, be taken to be that the Supreme Court had decided only that it was not a fit case where special leave petition should be granted.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 142 - V B Eradi - Full Document
1