Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 37 (0.29 seconds)
Mr.S.Elumalai vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu on 26 September, 2022 cites

The Ahmedabad St. Xaviers College ... vs State Of Gujarat & Anr on 26 April, 1974

'' The decisions of this Court make it clear that in the matter of appointment of the Principal, the management of a minority educational institution has a choice. It has been held that one of the incidents of the right to administer a minority educational institution is the selection of the Principal. Any rules which take away this right of the management have been held to be interfering with the right guaranteed by Article 30 of the Constitution. In this case, both Julius Prasad selected by the management and the third respondent are qualified and eligible for appointment as Principal according https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 46 of 56 W.P.Nos.40300 to 40304 of 2016 to rules. The question is whether the management is not entitled to select a person of their choice. The decisions of this Court including the decision in State of Kerala v. Very Rev. Mother Provincial, and Ahmedabad St. Xavier's College Society v. State of Gujarat, make it clear that this right of the minority educational institution cannot be taken away by any rules or regulations or by any enactment made by the State. We are, therefore, of the opinion that the High Court was not right in holding otherwise. The State has undoubtedly the power to regulate the affairs of the minority educational institutions also in the interest of discipline and excellence. But in that process, the aforesaid right of the management cannot be taken away, even if the Government is giving hundred per cent grant.''
Supreme Court of India Cites 153 - Cited by 397 - A N Ray - Full Document

State Of Kerala, Etc vs Very Rev. Mother Provincial, Etc on 10 August, 1970

'' The decisions of this Court make it clear that in the matter of appointment of the Principal, the management of a minority educational institution has a choice. It has been held that one of the incidents of the right to administer a minority educational institution is the selection of the Principal. Any rules which take away this right of the management have been held to be interfering with the right guaranteed by Article 30 of the Constitution. In this case, both Julius Prasad selected by the management and the third respondent are qualified and eligible for appointment as Principal according https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 46 of 56 W.P.Nos.40300 to 40304 of 2016 to rules. The question is whether the management is not entitled to select a person of their choice. The decisions of this Court including the decision in State of Kerala v. Very Rev. Mother Provincial, and Ahmedabad St. Xavier's College Society v. State of Gujarat, make it clear that this right of the minority educational institution cannot be taken away by any rules or regulations or by any enactment made by the State. We are, therefore, of the opinion that the High Court was not right in holding otherwise. The State has undoubtedly the power to regulate the affairs of the minority educational institutions also in the interest of discipline and excellence. But in that process, the aforesaid right of the management cannot be taken away, even if the Government is giving hundred per cent grant.''
Supreme Court of India Cites 25 - Cited by 186 - M Hidayatullah - Full Document

M. Bhoopathy (Died) And Ors. vs M.S. Vijayalakshmi And Anr. on 9 April, 1965

10. The learned counsel for the petitioners in support of his contentions relied on the judgment of the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in the case of The Secretary to Government, Government of Tamil Nadu, Education Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 6 and others Vs. S.Jeyalakshmi & another, reported in [2016] (4) L.W.841, the Division Bench made the following observations:
Madras High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 44 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next