Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.20 seconds)State Of Maharashtra vs Mishri Lal Tarachand Lodha And Ors. on 24 October, 1963
8. The judgments in M/s Icon Controls Pvt. Ltd. (supra) and
Mishrilal Tarachand Lodha (supra) relied upon by the learned
counsel for the appellants can be of no assistance to the appellants.
Both the above judgments were considering a plea whether the interest
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:SHALOO BATRA FAO(COMM) NO.200/2021 Page 4 of 6
Signing Date:18.12.2021
14:49:25
pendente lite or future interest is to be considered for purposes of
determining the pecuniary jurisdiction of the Court / the Court-fee
payable in an appeal. In fact, observations were made that there is no
dispute that interest claimed till the filing of the suit has to be added
for such a purpose.
Section 34 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
1