Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.29 seconds)

Union Of India & Ors vs N.R. Parmar & Ors on 27 November, 2012

7. Even the last affidavit which was filed on 27.01.2017 before this Court in contempt proceedings also, reveals expected time to be taken of not more than 2 months for preparing draft of All India inter-se seniority list of Income Tax Officers by interpolating all the seniority list of ITOs and then to be published on the website of the Department. Such ad hocism on the part of the Income Tax Department in the appointment of important post of ACIT de hors the directions issued in the case of Union of India Vs. N.R.Parmar (supra) and cannot be permitted even on the ground of administrative exigencies unless final seniority list of ITOs based on all India seniority is completed within time bound schedule. Even today, while passing this order, we have asked learned Counsel for the Department to seek instructions and state whether within specific time limit, it is possible for the concerned authority to prepare finally all India list of ITOs. However, she is unable to make any such statement.
Supreme Court of India Cites 22 - Cited by 242 - J S Khehar - Full Document

Sanjiv Mahajan And Anr., Pankaj Saxena ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 25 September, 2002

15. Some direct recruits again approached the CAT, Principal Bench by filing Original Application no.2307 of 1999 (Sanjeev Mahajan & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors.) alleging, that while drawing the seniority list dated 8.2.1999, the Department of Income Tax had not applied the "quota" and "rota" principle. On 23.2.2000, the CAT, Principal Bench disposed of OA no.2307 of 1999, and other connected original applications (Krishan Kanahiya & Ors.
Delhi High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 13 - S B Sinha - Full Document
1