Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.43 seconds)
Rungta Sons Private Ltd. vs Jugometal Trg. Republike And Anr. on 15 January, 1959 cites

Anderson Wright Ltd vs Moran And Company on 1 November, 1951

I may add that in an application under Section 34 of the Indian Arbitration Act the Court may in the exercise of its discretion decide an issue as to the continued existence of the arbitration agreement although such decision may indirectly involve a decision on an issue in the suit itself as to the continued existence of the parent contract: see Anderson Wright Ltd. v. Moran and Co. .
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 54 - B K Mukherjea - Full Document

Ramdas Dwarkadas vs The Orient Pictures on 1 April, 1942

In support of his contention Mr. Deb relied upon Turnock v. Sartoris (1889) 43 Ch. D. 150 and Ramdas Dwarkadas v. Orient Pictures, AIR 1942 Bom 332. In (1889) 43 Ch. D 150 there was a lease with an arbitration clause. Subsequently, another agreement in writing was entered into between the parties without any arbitration clauses. The existence and the validity of the subsequent agreement was not disputed but disputes arose between the parties as to their rights under both the lease and the subsequent agreement. The lessee having filed a suit in respect of these disputes, the lessor applied for stay of the suit. The court held that the arbitration clause referred to questions arising under the lease alone and refused to stay the suit. The court held that the subsequent agreement could not be treated as part of the lease.
Bombay High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 10 - Full Document

Arbitration Between Uttam Chand ... vs Mahmood Jewa Mamooji on 15 January, 1919

In Uttam Chand Saligram v. Jewa Mamooji, 1LR 46 Gal 534 : (AIR 1920 Cal 143), Rankin, J. decided that where the original contract for sale of goods is followed by a settlement contract whereby the buyer sells back the goods to the seller and the claim by the buyer for the consequential money difference is disputed by the seller the dispute arises out of the contract and it is open to the buyer to found his claim upon the submission contained in the original contract.
Calcutta High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 22 - Full Document
1