Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 20 (0.22 seconds)The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 164 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 363 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 366 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 161 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Ram Gopal, Chairman, U.P. And Higher ... vs State Of U.P. And Another on 3 September, 1998
(vi) In connected Application u/s 482 No.1677 of 2015 (Ram Gopal vs. State of U.P. and another), Ram Gopal is the real brother of Bahau, who has also been chargesheeted and Ram Gopal in his application has sought a similar prayer as of co-accused Bahau in Crl. Misc.
Chhotu @ Pradeep Yadav @ Pradeep Kumar ... vs State Of U.P. on 23 May, 2022
(viii). Relying upon the above judgments the learned counsel for applicant has hammered his submissions that earlier 482 application No.2072 of 2017 (Pradeep Kumar Yadav vs. State of U.P.) which was dismissed on 03.04.2017 does not contain a single averment, touching the facts of the present case. While dismissing the above 482 application, the Coordinate Bench of this Court has mainly focused upon the scope and ambit of Section 482 Cr.P.C. while taking into account the number of decisions given by Hon'ble Apex Court, in a most mechanical fashion come to the conclusion that a prima facie offence is made out against the applicant.
Bahau Rajbhar vs State Of U.P. And Another on 5 November, 2020
(i) Both these petitions are connected petitions and in their respective parent orders while entertaining and granting the interim order, the Bench of this Court had directed the applicants to file a counter affidavit. Office report dated 12.11.2014 of 482 application No.3413 of 2014, indicates that notices were served upon opposite party no.2 personally, but no counter affidavit has been filed in this matter. Application u/s 482 No.3413 of 2014 (Bahau and another vs. State of U.P. and another) is the leading case. This petition should be decided with Crl. Misc.
State Of Haryana vs Pradeep Kumar & Ors. on 10 December, 1998
(i). The prayer sought in the present petition is to quash the impugned Charge Sheet No.2A/16 dated 18.5.2016, summoning order dated 24.01.2017 as well as entire criminal proceeding in Session Trial No.2/17 (State vs. Pradeep Kumar), arising out of Case Crime No.138/2013, u/s 363, 366, 376 I.P.C. and ¾ POCSO Act, P.S.-Kotwali Kunda, District Pratapgrah, pending in the court of Additional Session Judge (POCSO Act), Pratapgarh.