Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.20 seconds)Section 149 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 323 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 147 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 307 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 342 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Lakshmi Singh And Ors. vs State Of Bihar on 10 September, 1976
"This Court clearly pointed out that where the
prosecution fails to explain the injuries on the accused,
two results follow: (1) that the evidence of the
prosecution witnesses is untrue: and (2) that the injuries
probabilise the plea taken by the appellants. The High
Court in the pre-sent case has not correctly applied the
principles laid down by this Court in the decision referred
to above. In some of the recent cases, the same principle
was laid down.
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Munshi Ram And Others vs Delhi Administration on 27 November, 1967
To borrow the golden words from the judgment rendered by
the Supreme Court in the case of Munshi Ram and Others Vs. Delhi
Administration, reported as A.I.R. 1968 S.C. 702, we can also say
that the law does not require a person whose property is forcibly tried
to be occupied by trespassers to run away and seek the protection of
the authorities. The right of private defence serves a social purpose and
that right should be liberally construed. Such a right not only will be a
restraining influence on bad characters but it will encourage the right
spirit in a free citizen. There is nothing more degrading to the human
spirit than to run away in the face of peril.