Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.52 seconds)
Dr.Sudhir Shyam & Another vs State Of Punjab And Others on 1 June, 2011 cites

Mrs. Rekha Chaturvedi vs University Of Rajasthan And Ors on 13 January, 1993

Mrs. Rekha Chaturvedi Vs. University of Rajasthan & Ors. JT 1993 (1) SC 220; Dr. M.V. Nair Vs. Union of India & Ors. 1993 (2) SCC 429; and U.P. Public Service Commission, U.P., Allahabad & Anr. Vs. Alpana JT 1994 (1) SC 94, the High Court has held (i) that the cut off date by reference to which the eligibility requirement must be satisfied by the candidate seeking a public employment is the date appointed by the relevant service rules and if there be no cut off date appointed by the rules then such date as may be appointed for the purpose in the advertisement calling for applications; ii) that if there be no such date appointed then the eligibility criteria shall be applied by reference to the last date appointed by which the applications have to be received by the competent authority. The view taken by the High Court is supported by several decisions of this Court and is therefore well settled and hence cannot be found fault with......"
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 328 - P B Sawant - Full Document

Bhupinderpal Singh & Ors vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 1 May, 2000

This view has been reiterated in almost all subsequent judgments. Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Bhupinderpal Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and others, 2000(2) RSJ considered similar questions of acquiring eligibility. It has been held that where the cut off date for acquiring eligibility is prescribed under the statutory rules, the same shall CWP No.3884 of 2011 9 prevail and where no cut off date is mentioned in the rules, the cut off date notified in the advertisement is to be treated as the date for acquiring eligibility and in absence of any such stipulation in the statutory rules or advertisement, the last date for receipt of applications is to be considered as the date for acquiring eligibility. Relying upon a number of judgments of Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed as under:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 178 - R C Lahoti - Full Document

Dr. M.V. Nair vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 22 January, 1993

Mrs. Rekha Chaturvedi Vs. University of Rajasthan & Ors. JT 1993 (1) SC 220; Dr. M.V. Nair Vs. Union of India & Ors. 1993 (2) SCC 429; and U.P. Public Service Commission, U.P., Allahabad & Anr. Vs. Alpana JT 1994 (1) SC 94, the High Court has held (i) that the cut off date by reference to which the eligibility requirement must be satisfied by the candidate seeking a public employment is the date appointed by the relevant service rules and if there be no cut off date appointed by the rules then such date as may be appointed for the purpose in the advertisement calling for applications; ii) that if there be no such date appointed then the eligibility criteria shall be applied by reference to the last date appointed by which the applications have to be received by the competent authority. The view taken by the High Court is supported by several decisions of this Court and is therefore well settled and hence cannot be found fault with......"
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 152 - Full Document

U.P. Public Service Commission vs Alpana on 17 January, 1994

Mrs. Rekha Chaturvedi Vs. University of Rajasthan & Ors. JT 1993 (1) SC 220; Dr. M.V. Nair Vs. Union of India & Ors. 1993 (2) SCC 429; and U.P. Public Service Commission, U.P., Allahabad & Anr. Vs. Alpana JT 1994 (1) SC 94, the High Court has held (i) that the cut off date by reference to which the eligibility requirement must be satisfied by the candidate seeking a public employment is the date appointed by the relevant service rules and if there be no cut off date appointed by the rules then such date as may be appointed for the purpose in the advertisement calling for applications; ii) that if there be no such date appointed then the eligibility criteria shall be applied by reference to the last date appointed by which the applications have to be received by the competent authority. The view taken by the High Court is supported by several decisions of this Court and is therefore well settled and hence cannot be found fault with......"
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 192 - A M Ahmadi - Full Document

Amardeep Singh Sahota vs The State Of Punjab Etc. on 20 May, 1993

Thereafter the petitioner could have produced the said result before the authorities. It is clear that no fault is attributable to any of the respondents. As per the Full Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Amardeep Singh Sahota v. State of Punjab and others, 1993(4) SCT 328 (P&H) (FB): 1993 (4) SLR 673 and Rahul Prabhakar v. Punjab Technical University, Jalandhar and others, 1997 (3) SCT 526 (P&H) (FB): 1997 (3) PLR 13 terms and conditions of the brochure are binding...."
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 99 - H S Bedi - Full Document
1   2 Next