Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.49 seconds)State Of U.P. & Ors vs Ashok Kumar Saxena And Another Etc on 4 February, 1998
In State of U.P. and Ors. Vs. Ashok Kumar and Anr.
reported in (1996) 32 Administrative Tribunal Cases 239,
Supreme Court has held as under:
Om Kumar And Ors vs Union Of India on 17 November, 2000
In Om Kumar's case (Supra), it was held:-
Union Of India & Another vs G. Ganayutham on 27 August, 1997
It was also so stated in Union of
India v. Ganayutham MANU/SC/0834/1997.
Bhagat Ram vs State Of Himachal Pradesh And Ors. on 24 January, 1983
16. Learned counsel for Petitioner has placed reliance on a
judgment rendered by the Supreme Court titled Shri Bhagat Ram
WPC No. 2739/1999 Page 10 of 11
Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others reported in 1993 (1)
Service Law Reporter 626. We have perused this judgment and
find that the same is in different facts. In the said case Petitioner
was working as a Forest Guard and some trees, falling in his beat
area, were cut. Departmental enquiry was held on the ground
that he was negligent in supervising the area under his
jurisdiction. In the present case question involved is as to
whether act of a police constable remaining absent from duty
without leave for an unreasonable period would constitute grave
misconduct. We have already noted above that the police force is
a disciplined force and if a constable remains absent without
obtaining leave the same would constitute grave misconduct.
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Ex Constable Mohar Singh vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 31 May, 2002
In Ex Constable Mohar Singh Vs. Union of India and Ors.
reported in MANU/DE/0818/2002 a Division Bench of this Court
held that the absence of delinquent employee for 150 days on the
WPC No. 2739/1999 Page 8 of 11
alleged ground of being suffering from tuberculosis without
obtaining leave was a serious misconduct. Doctrine of
proportionality was also discussed in the said case and it was
observed as under:
1