Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.28 seconds)

Alamelu Ammal vs Chinnaswamy Reddiar on 2 December, 1988

20.The arguments of the learned counsel for the 1st respondent that the question of fraudulent transfer cannot be considered in execution proceedings cannot be sustained in the light of the Judgment of this Court reported in Alamelu Ammal v. Chinnaswamy Reddiar [CDJ 1988 MHC 161], where the learned Judge of this Court relying upon the Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in C.Abdul Shukoor Saheb vs Arji Papa Rao and others [AIR 1963 SC 1150] and the earlier Judgment of this Court reported in Ramaswami Chettiar v. Mallappa Reddiar [1920 AIR (Mad) 748] has held that a transaction which is voidable under Section 53(2) of the Act can be avoided not only by filing a suit but also be raised as a defence to the proceedings under Order 21 Rule 58 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Madras High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 9 - Full Document

N.N.L. Ramaswami Chettiar vs Mallappa Reddiar on 29 April, 1920

20.The arguments of the learned counsel for the 1st respondent that the question of fraudulent transfer cannot be considered in execution proceedings cannot be sustained in the light of the Judgment of this Court reported in Alamelu Ammal v. Chinnaswamy Reddiar [CDJ 1988 MHC 161], where the learned Judge of this Court relying upon the Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in C.Abdul Shukoor Saheb vs Arji Papa Rao and others [AIR 1963 SC 1150] and the earlier Judgment of this Court reported in Ramaswami Chettiar v. Mallappa Reddiar [1920 AIR (Mad) 748] has held that a transaction which is voidable under Section 53(2) of the Act can be avoided not only by filing a suit but also be raised as a defence to the proceedings under Order 21 Rule 58 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Madras High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 38 - Full Document

C. Abdul Shukoor Saheb vs Arji Papa Rao And Others on 14 November, 1962

20.The arguments of the learned counsel for the 1st respondent that the question of fraudulent transfer cannot be considered in execution proceedings cannot be sustained in the light of the Judgment of this Court reported in Alamelu Ammal v. Chinnaswamy Reddiar [CDJ 1988 MHC 161], where the learned Judge of this Court relying upon the Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in C.Abdul Shukoor Saheb vs Arji Papa Rao and others [AIR 1963 SC 1150] and the earlier Judgment of this Court reported in Ramaswami Chettiar v. Mallappa Reddiar [1920 AIR (Mad) 748] has held that a transaction which is voidable under Section 53(2) of the Act can be avoided not only by filing a suit but also be raised as a defence to the proceedings under Order 21 Rule 58 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 54 - N R Ayyangar - Full Document
1