Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.90 seconds)
Karam Singh And Another vs Paramjit Saini on 17 April, 2012 cites

Ram Lal Yadav And Ors. vs State Of U.P. And Ors. on 1 February, 1989

This is also the view taken by the Full bench in the case of Ram Lal Yadava v. State of U.P. And others, reported in 1990(1) RCR (Criminal) 647: 1989 (26) CRM M-678 of 2011 -9- ACC 181. Furthermore, it may be pointed out that proceedings under the Act are essentially civil in nature and it is only for the purpose of cutting down procedural delays, that powers have been conferred on a Magistrate under the provisions of the Cr.P.C. for enforcement of the rights under the Act and for this reason also an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should not ordinarily lie against an order under the Act."
Allahabad High Court Cites 30 - Cited by 43 - Full Document

T.Siva Raman vs P.Renganayaki on 27 April, 2005

In the case of R. Siva Raman v. P. Renganayaki 2005(4) RCR (Civil), the Single Bench of Madras High Court while relying on the judgment of the Apex Court rendered in the case of Y. Narasimha Rao v. Y. Venkata Lakshmi (1991) 3 SCC 451 held that when the parties are serving in America but are not permanent residents of America, a suit for dissolution of marriage at California (America) filed by the husband on ground of desertion by wife and the wife neither has submitted to the Court nor consented to it, divorce as per American laws and decree of dissolution of marriage by California Court cannot be said to be valid and further held in para 12 as under:
Madras High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1   2 Next