Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.19 seconds)Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 120B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 406 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 420 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 467 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 468 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Sanjay Chandra vs Cbi on 23 November, 2011
9. For the aforesaid reasons, this Court is of the opinion that
further detention of the Petitioner, in the given circumstances, is not called
for at this stage, in view of the legal position expounded by the Apex Court
in the case of Sanjay Chandra (supra) that notwithstanding the magnitude
of the economic offences allegedly committed by an accused who is as yet
not convicted, refusal of bail in the circumstances would be improper as a
mark of disapproval of a formal conduct to an unconvicted person for the
purpose of giving him a taste of imprisonment as a lesson.
Section 471 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
State Of Kerala vs Raneef on 3 January, 2011
It is not in the interest of justice
that accused should be in jail for an indefinite period. No
doubt, the offence alleged against the Appellants is a
serious one in terms of alleged huge loss to the State
exchequer, that, by itself, should not deter us from enlarging
the Appellants on bail when there is no serious contention
of the Respondent that the accused, if released on bail,
would interfere with the trial or tamper with evidence. We
do not see any good reason to detain the accused in
custody, that too, after the completion of the investigation
and filing of the charge-sheet. This Court, in the case of
State of Kerala V. Raneef MANU/SC/0001/2011 : (2011) 1
SCC 784, has stated:
1