Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.27 seconds)
Sahim Hossain & Ors vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 13 September, 2023 cites

Rajesh Kumar Daria vs Rajasthan Public Service Commission & ... on 18 July, 2007

He has relied upon 2007 volume 8 Supreme Court Cases 785 (Rajesh kumar Daria versus Rajasthan Public Service Commission and others), 2010 Volume 3 Supreme Court Cases 119 (Jitendra Kumar Singh and another versus State of Uttar Pradesh and others), 2019 Volume 16 Supreme Court Cases 129 (B. K. Pavitra and others versus Union of India and others) and 2022 volume 4 Supreme Court Cases 1 (Neil Aurelio Nuns (OBC Reservation) and others versus Union of India) in support of his contention that, a candidate who obtained age relaxation but participated in the selection process with the unreserved category can be considered and placed in the unreserved category merit wise.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 495 - K G Balakrishnan - Full Document

B.K.Pavitra & Ors vs Union Of India & Ors on 9 February, 2017

He has relied upon 2007 volume 8 Supreme Court Cases 785 (Rajesh kumar Daria versus Rajasthan Public Service Commission and others), 2010 Volume 3 Supreme Court Cases 119 (Jitendra Kumar Singh and another versus State of Uttar Pradesh and others), 2019 Volume 16 Supreme Court Cases 129 (B. K. Pavitra and others versus Union of India and others) and 2022 volume 4 Supreme Court Cases 1 (Neil Aurelio Nuns (OBC Reservation) and others versus Union of India) in support of his contention that, a candidate who obtained age relaxation but participated in the selection process with the unreserved category can be considered and placed in the unreserved category merit wise.
Supreme Court of India Cites 36 - Cited by 85 - A K Goel - Full Document

Neil Aurelio Nunes vs Union Of India on 20 January, 2022

He has relied upon 2007 volume 8 Supreme Court Cases 785 (Rajesh kumar Daria versus Rajasthan Public Service Commission and others), 2010 Volume 3 Supreme Court Cases 119 (Jitendra Kumar Singh and another versus State of Uttar Pradesh and others), 2019 Volume 16 Supreme Court Cases 129 (B. K. Pavitra and others versus Union of India and others) and 2022 volume 4 Supreme Court Cases 1 (Neil Aurelio Nuns (OBC Reservation) and others versus Union of India) in support of his contention that, a candidate who obtained age relaxation but participated in the selection process with the unreserved category can be considered and placed in the unreserved category merit wise.
Supreme Court of India Cites 60 - Cited by 15 - D Y Chandrachud - Full Document

Ajithkumar P And Ors vs Remin K R And Ors on 13 October, 2015

44. Relaxation in age and fees cannot be construed to be obtaining a benefit in the course for ascertainment of merit of a candidate. It is merely an enabling provision to enable 28 designated section of the society, an opportunity to complete. Facilitating a designated section of the society to partake in a selection process cannot be equated to grant of privilege during ascertainment of merit in the selection process such relaxation given at the preliminary stage has no relevance for the determination of merit of candidate. Ajithkumar P. (supra) has held that, relaxation of concession given at the preliminary stage cannot have any relevance in determining the merit of a candidate.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 18 - Full Document
1   2 Next