Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (2.24 seconds)

Joti Parshad vs State Of Haryana on 20 October, 1992

13.Next submission is that there is nothing on record to prove that the petitioner had knowledge that the driver was in an inebirated condition and the Trial Court had only persumed about the smell of alcohol in the Car. Therefore, it proceeded on the mere presumption and surmises, is the contention. But, however, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, in Jothi Parshad Vs. State of 2 CDJ 2007 SC 756 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 9/12 Crl.R.C.No.410 of 2022 Haryana3, while dealing with the above concepts of "knowledge" and "reason to believe", in paragraph No.5 held as follows:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 50 - G N Ray - Full Document
1   2 Next