Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 26 (0.31 seconds)Section 23 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
The Urban Land (Ceiling And Regulation) Act, 1976
The Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Section 17 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 6 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
State Of Karnataka & Ors vs Narasimhamurthy & Ors on 11 August, 1995
In State of Karnataka v. Narasimhamurthy [ 1995 (5) SCC 524 : JT (1995)
6 SC 375 SCC(p) 526, para 7 : JT at p. 378, para 7), this Court held that
right to shelter is a fundamental right to shelter is a fundamental right
under Article 19(1) of the Constitution. To make the right meaningful to
the poor, the State has to provide facilities and opportunity to build
houses. Acquisition of the land to provide house sites to the poor
houseless is a public purpose as it is the constitutional duty of the State
to provide house sites to the poor
Kasireddy Papaiah (Died) And Ors. vs The Government Of Andhra Pradesh And ... on 25 November, 1974
The ratio of Kasireddy
Papaiah case 1975 AIR(AP) 269 : 1975 (1) APLJ 70] was quoted with approval
by a three-Judge Bench in Deepak Pahwa v. Lt. Governor of Delhi [ 1984 (4)
SCC 308 : 1985 (1) SCR 588]. The delay by the officials was held to be not
a ground to set at naught the power to exercise urgency clause in both the
above decisions. It would thus be clear that housing accommodation to the
Dalits and Tribes is in acute shortage and the State has undertaken as its
economic policy under planned expenditure to provide shelter to them on a
war footing, in compliance with the constitutional obligation undertaken as
a member of the UNO to the resolutions referred to hereinbefore
State Of U.P. Etc vs Smt. Pista Devi & Ors on 12 September, 1986
In Pista Devi case [ 1986 (4) SCC 251 ] this Court
while considering the legality of the exercise of the power under Section
17(4) exercised by the State Government dispensing with the inquiry under
Section 5-A for acquiring housing accommodation for planned development of
Meerut, had held that providing housing accommodation is national urgency
of which court should take judicial notice. The pre-notification and post-
notification delay caused by the officer concerned does not create a cause
to hold that there is no urgency. Housing conditions of Dalits all over the
country continue to be miserable even till date and is a fact of which
courts are bound to take judicial notice.
Deepak Pahwa Etc vs Lt. Governer Of Delhi And Ors on 22 August, 1984
In
Deepak Pahwa case [ 1984 (4) SCC 308 : 1985 (1) SCR 588] this Court had
that very often person interested in the land reposed to be acquired may
make representations to the authorities concerned against the proposed writ
petition that is bound to result in multiplicity of enquiries,
communications and discussions leading invariably to delay in the execution
of even urgent projects. Very often delay makes the problem more and more
acute and increases urgency of the necessity for acquisition.