Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.59 seconds)Section 406 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 415 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Dr. Madan Mohan Rao vs The State Of Tamil Nadu, Represented By ... on 24 February, 1983
10. This court in AM Mohan v. State Represented by SHO & Another8,
has observed as follows:"13. It could be thus seen for attracting the
provision of Section 420 of IPC, the FIR/complaint must show that the
ingredients of Section 415 of IPC are made out and the person cheated
must have been dishonestly induced to deliver the property to any person;
or to make, alter or destroy valuable security or anything signed or sealed
andcapable of being converted into valuable security. In other words, for
attracting the provisions of Section 420 of IPC, it must be shown that the
FIR/complaint discloses:
The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Section 138 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Smt. Rashmi Kumar vs Mahesh Kumar Bhada on 18 December, 1996
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/14223/2013 ORDER DATED: 06/08/2025
undefined
9.1 This court, while discussing the expression "entrustment" in Rashmi
Kumar v. Mahesh Kumar Bhada5, observed that it carries with it the
implication that the person handing over any property or on whose behalf
that property is handed over to another, continues to be its owner.
Entrustment is not necessarily a term of law. It may have different
implications in different contexts. In its most general significance, all its
imports is handing over the possession for some purpose which may not
imply the conferment of any proprietary right therein. The ownership or
beneficial interest in the property in respect of which criminal breach of
trust is alleged to have been committed,must be in some person other than
the accused and the latter must hold iton account of some person or in
some way for his benefit.
Hridaya Rangan Pd. Verma And Ors vs State Of Bihar And Anr on 31 March, 2000
9.2 Further, in Hridaya Ranjan Prasad Verma v. State of Bihar6, this
court observed as follows:
Prof. R.K. Vijayasarathy vs Sudha Seetharam on 15 February, 2019
(Emphasis supplied)
9.3 The ingredients to constitute an offence under sections 415 read with
420 of IPC have been considered and laid down by this court in Prof. R.K.
Vijayasarathy and Anr v. Sudha Seetharam and Anr7, as under: