Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.25 seconds)

Chanasma Haluka Sarvodaya Majur Kamdar ... vs The Dcit Cpc, Bangaluru on 13 July, 2022

), the ITAT held that to be eligible to make claim under section 80-IA or any other section of Chapter VI A, assessee should have I.T.A No. 33/Rjt/2022 A.Y. 2019-20 Page No 9 Dhar Seva Sahakari Mandali Ltd. vs. DCIT(CPC) filed return of income under section 139(1) and even if it did not make claim for deduction in original return and subsequently file revised return making such claim, its claim for deduction under section 80-IA is maintainable. Therefore, where assessee had filed return under section 139(1), it was entitled to claim deduction under section 80-IA even if such claim was not made in original return but subsequently in revised return filed in response to notice issued under section 153A.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 2 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Right Tight Fastners Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai vs Acit-11 (1)(1), Mumbai on 11 January, 2021

5.5 In Right Tight Fastners Pvt. Ltd vs Acit-11(1)(1), Mumbai (ITA No. 3101/Mum/2018, A.Y 2012-13) Hon'ble ITAT "D" Bench, Mumbai on 11 January, 2021 held - Thus, considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case in the light of the decisions referred to I.T.A No. 33/Rjt/2022 A.Y. 2019-20 Page No 4 Dhar Seva Sahakari Mandali Ltd. vs. DCIT(CPC) above and more particularly applying the ratio of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Dilip Kumar & Co. & Ors. (supra), we hold that the condition imposed under section 80AC of the Act has to be fulfilled for claiming deduction under 801B(10) of the Act. Since, the assessee has not fulfilled the aforesaid condition, deduction claimed under section 80IB(10) of the Act has been rightly denied by the Departmental Authorities. Accordingly, the order passed by learned Commissioner (Appeals) is upheld. Grounds raised are dismissed.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 26 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

The Chirakkal Service Co-Operative ... vs The Commissioner Of Income Tax on 28 February, 2013

7.3 We note that in the case of Chirakkal Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. Kannur v. CIT 2016] 68 taxmann.com 298 (Kerala), the Kerala High Court held that a return filed by assessee beyond period stipulated under section 139(1) or 139(4) or under section 142(1) or section 148 can also be accepted and acted upon for entertaining claim raised under section 80P provided further proceedings in relation to such assessments are pending in statutory hierarchy of adjudication in terms of provisions of Act. In the case of ASR Engg. & Projects Ltd. [2019] 111 taxmann.com 49 (Hyderabad - Trib.
Kerala High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 241 - Full Document
1   2 Next